Warning: session_start(): open(/tmp/sess_cu94f4941t8buci4jipirgrqg7, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /www/H01/htdocs/lib/base/lib_base.php on line 280
I and my body openDesktop.org
-
 KDE-Apps.org Applications for the KDE-Desktop 
 GTK-Apps.org Applications using the GTK Toolkit 
 GnomeFiles.org Applications for GNOME 
 MeeGo-Central.org Applications for MeeGo 
 CLI-Apps.org Command Line Applications 
 Qt-Apps.org Free Qt Applications 
 Qt-Prop.org Proprietary Qt Applications 
 Maemo-Apps.org Applications for the Maemo Plattform 
 Java-Apps.org Free Java Applications 
 eyeOS-Apps.org Free eyeOS Applications 
 Wine-Apps.org Wine Applications 
 Server-Apps.org Server Applications 
 apps.ownCloud.com ownCloud Applications 
--
-
 KDE-Look.org Artwork for the KDE-Desktop 
 GNOME-Look.org Artwork for the GNOME-Desktop 
 Xfce-Look.org Artwork for the Xfce-Desktop 
 Box-Look.org Artwork for your Windowmanager 
 E17-Stuff.org Artwork for Enlightenment 
 Beryl-Themes.org Artwork for the Beryl Windowmanager 
 Compiz-Themes.org Artwork for the Compiz Windowmanager 
 EDE-Look.org Themes for your EDE Desktop 
--
-
 Debian-Art.org Stuff for Debian 
 Gentoo-Art.org Artwork for Gentoo Linux 
 SUSE-Art.org Artwork for openSUSE 
 Ubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Ubuntu 
 Kubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Kubuntu 
 LinuxMint-Art.org Artwork for Linux Mint 
 Arch-Stuff.org Art And Stuff for Arch Linux 
 Frugalware-Art.org Themes for Frugalware 
 Fedora-Art.org Artwork for Fedora Linux 
 Mandriva-Art.org Artwork for Mandriva Linux 
--
-
 KDE-Files.org Files for KDE Applications 
 OpenTemplate.org Documents for OpenOffice.org
 GIMPStuff.org Files for GIMP
 InkscapeStuff.org Files for Inkscape
 ScribusStuff.org Files for Scribus
 BlenderStuff.org Textures and Objects for Blender
 VLC-Addons.org Themes and Extensions for VLC
--
-
 KDE-Help.org Support for your KDE Desktop 
 GNOME-Help.org Support for your GNOME Desktop 
 Xfce-Help.org Support for your Xfce Desktop 
--
openDesktop.orgopenDesktop.org:   Applications   Artwork   Linux Distributions   Documents    Linux42.org    OpenSkillz.com   
 
Home
Apps
Artwork
News
Groups
Knowledge
Events
Forum
People
Jobs
Register
Login


-
- Content .- Fans (5) . 

I and my body

   XP  

KDE Wallpaper 1024x768

Score 34%
I and my body
zoom


I and my body
zoom


I and my body
zoom


Link:  http://
Downloads:  89810
Submitted:  Aug 29 2006
Updated:  Dec 27 2006

Description:

It is wallpapers inspired by my boyfriend.

Hi, I think I no more put my wallpapers here before You do'nt like it. If You realy like it, You can contact me by email.

PS2
If You like me and my work and whish to domate me (to new camera) send me email.




Changelog:

- added the last wallpaper



License:
You can only use this as You wallpaper ;)

(xmas)
Send to a friend
Subscribe
Other  Content  from xivona
Report inappropriate content



goto page: prev   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15 ...

-
.

 email??

 
 by steo on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

I can't find your email...


Reply to this

-

 issues!

 
 by RipTorn on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

I fail to see how some posters justify this as XXX, if she (if it is really her) wish's to make wallpapers of her self so be it, if you don't like it don't download it, that is a pretty simple to follow... I do think that they could be made better without simple preset filters and made to be more artistic,,,,
but it aint XXX take a visit to some places in euro land to find out for your self...


-Rip
Reply to this

-
.

 NO NO NO

 
 by sabby7890 on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

This girl's body is great, but I disagree with posting adult pictures on KDE-Look.org. This site is for everyone, so kids might be watching it too.

Some guys misunderstood the meaning of freedom - your freedom to watch adult pics on KDE-Look can't affect other person's freedom, especially parents that allow kids to watch KDE-Look.

Adult entries should be removed, such wallpapers everybody can download from other sites.

PS. If you disagree with me - get a life, get a girlfriend.


Cheers,
Tomasz Salacinski

Reply to this

-

 Re: NO NO NO

 
 by ariszlo on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

Nudity != porn. These are not adult pictures.


Ariszló
Reply to this

-

 scared

 
 by Divilinux on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%
DivilinuxDivilinux
www.squadrai nformatica.c om/smak
Home

i'm courious to see next wallpaper
you started with soft,naked,completely naked..i'm scared to what figure it out next..?


Reply to this

-
.

 secret

 
 by linuxpimp on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

why are the people here hating mine art and giving you nice words and a happy point.?we are both not ugly.


Reply to this

-

 Re: secret

 
 by RipTorn on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

I think there is a slight difference in sticking up pictures of someone cracking their asscheeks open...

http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=45233

:\ come on ... also for someone to pretend not to know how to speak "Engrish" its the difference in saying that is terrible and voting bad on it, and sticking up your own pics in anger, this is KDE-Look not myspace.


-Rip
Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Re: secret

 
 by linuxpimp on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

thanks for making post of my art... my anus opening is no for looking into.... the art is tasty done..not trash. no holes no public hair crotch. you are an ass cracking open with bad feelings and anger. be nice I show no fur.


Reply to this

-

 Art...?

 
 by creativeambience on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

I respect your expression as an artist, but it is perpetually important to be cognizant of your audience. There *are* children on kde-look.org who don't know the difference between nudity as an art form and as something that is sexual in nature and therefore lack the 'appreciation' for nudity as an art form - it just becomes pr0n for them. So...while I respect your expresion, I would strongly suggest trying another venue, such as deviantART, or perhaps advocating the implementation of restrictions on kde-look content until a user has registered an account. This won't keep eyes out that seek this material, but it will prevent those who might otherwise not be prepared for exposure from seeing material such as this before they have matured appropriately.


--
caSignature

Reply to this

-

 Re: Art...?

 
 by gnemmi on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

Wouldn't it be easier if those children's parents looked after him and took the apropiate measures to prevent their children for getting a glimps of such an obscenity as human nudity?

After all .. aren't those parents responsable for the caring and education of their children?

The answer to why free expression should be cercenated in order to let uncareful parents not to fulfill their legal duties and responsabilities is something that really eludes me.

Should libraries not carry certain books only beacuse uncarefuly raised children may take a peek on them?

Should Video stores not carry certain products only beacuse uncarefuly raised children may take a peek on them?

Should the internet turn itself into a children's playground and all the knowledge shared whithin it be only as complex as a child can understand, because otherwise children might not comprehend what it means and thus missinterpret it?

Wouldn't it be much easier if those who brought life to this world, took care of it as they are supposed to?

Wouldn't it be a lot less harmfull to everybody's rights if those parents took the time and the effort to do as they are supposed to do?


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Re: Art...?

 
 by euxneks on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

Wouldn't it be easier if those children's parents looked after him and took the apropiate measures to prevent their children for getting a glimps of such an obscenity as human nudity?

To a certain degree. I think it's not right for parents to expect other people to look after their children for them, but in that same vein of thought, we have to consider what the implications are of exposing a child to such material. I doubt it's as scarring or traumatic for a child to be exposed to a naked woman as it is to be taught that the naked body is something that should be hidden and embarrassed about.

Should the internet turn itself into a children's playground and all the knowledge shared whithin it be only as complex as a child can understand, because otherwise children might not comprehend what it means and thus missinterpret it?


Hrm. I was going to say this is irrelevant but knowledge of sex is still knowledge. I think we have to accept sooner or later that once a child has access to something as large as the internet, they are going to learn things. However, having said that, I don't think I would want any child of mine to be looking at pictures of nude women, much less placing them on their desktop.

So, what's the solution? I don't think kde-look.org should have an XXX section of the site, because that could easily become very scary and take over the site - it is after all the basest nature of man to procreate.

On the other hand, I usually come here to gather pictures of plants, serene images etc. etc. that have mostly to do with linux. I don't look for pictures like this on kde-look.org because I don't think of kde-look.org as a repository for these images and I am glad of that.

Yes, she has a nice body, smooth skin etc. etc. All very admirable, but this is not the place to post such pictures.


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Re: Art...?

 
 by gnemmi on: Sep 5 2006
 
Score 50%

I doubt it's as scarring or traumatic for a child to be exposed to a naked woman as it is to be taught that the naked body is something that should be hidden and embarrassed about.

Well ... that makes two of us.

I was going to say this is irrelevant but knowledge of sex is still knowledge.

Pretty clever of you not taking that bait ;)
Sorting out whether a given kind of knowledge is or is not relevant carries huge risks ... and has failed miserably in the past. It has actually costed lives ...

I don't think I would want any child of mine to be looking at pictures of nude women, much less placing them on their desktop.

And so wouldn't I. That's why I don't let third parties the control on what my childrens are exposed to. That control is on me, and only on me.

So, what's the solution? I don't think kde-look.org should have an XXX section of the site

Agreed.

All very admirable, but this is not the place to post such pictures.

It's not really clear what you mean by "such" and how that concept of "such" fits into the concept of "art" ... or are you willing to state that "art" is only "art" if it fits into the boundaries of some undetermined limits (namely: a "such")?

Yet the answer to the question "why should free expression be cercenated in order to let uncareful parents not to fulfill their legal duties and responsabilities" is something that _still_ really eludes me.


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Re: Re: Re: Art.

 
 by euxneks on: Sep 6 2006
 
Score 50%

And so wouldn't I. That's why I don't let third parties the control on what my childrens are exposed to. That control is on me, and only on me.

True, however, there is a certain amount of decency that generally all human societies have, though varying in extremes, we can expect some people not to show their bodily parts to a child - this is generally considered unacceptable specifically because society as a whole has defined the moral limits of decency. But then again there are nudist camps. I have no idea what they consider "decent". :P

It's not really clear what you mean by "such" and how that concept of "such" fits into the concept of "art" ... or are you willing to state that "art" is only "art" if it fits into the boundaries of some undetermined limits (namely: a "such")?

Naked bodies and/or body parts. They're not really something that I would want on my desktop - again, this varies from person to person so I guess I should state that this is my opinion. =) So, my opinion: "I would prefer there not to be a pornographic section/ adult section to kde-look.org" I think of kde-look.org as a place where people can gather to share what is considered traditionally as Appolonian art. The stuff that looks nice and has symmetry, utilitarian maybe, etc. etc.

Yet the answer to the question "why should free expression be cercenated in order to let uncareful parents not to fulfill their legal duties and responsabilities" is something that _still_ really eludes me.

I think he/she meant "censored" ;P I agree with not censoring, but we can still decide where we go and who we allow ourselves to associate with when we approach there. As far as I know, this is a community based website and as such there isn't complete freedom. We all expect each other not to post extremes on the site and I think nude pictures are pushing it a bit too far. Topless women are still a little bit far, but I guess that's my North American (Canada actually) close-mindedness. (Is that a word?) I enjoy the female body (nekkid, as it were) as much as the next red-blooded male but I would have to say that this hasn't been in the past a site to post this kind of art. (as far as I'm aware).. I think we should keep it that way.

Note: Since I had last posted one of the previews has cut the top and bottom parts of the wallpapers off to censor certain body parts of the female persuasion =)


Reply to this

goto page: prev   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15 ...

Add commentBack




-



 
 
 Who we are
Contact
More about us
Frequently Asked Questions
Register
Twitter
Blog
Explore
Apps
Artwork
Jobs
Knowledge
Events
People
Updates on identi.ca
Updates on Twitter
Content RSS   
Events RSS   

Participate
Groups
Forum
Add Content
Public API
About openDesktop.org
Legal Notice
Spreadshirt Shop
CafePress Shop
Advertising
Sponsor us
Report Abuse
 

Copyright 2007-2016 openDesktop.org Team  
All rights reserved. openDesktop.org is not liable for any content or goods on this site.
All contributors are responsible for the lawfulness of their uploads.
openDesktop is a trademark of the openDesktop.org Team