| Some requests
Apr 28 2007 on content K-CSS |
You may have done it as an example of learning Qt, but you can make it really useful for people and also learn more Qt tricks. Quanta is not for windows too. Other applications are not good enough for small tasks.
Visual studio gives option of opening file with external editor. And there are not good free editors.
Some suggestions:-
1. Auto-Completion. This should be easy enough.
2. Hightlight and auto-complete css from regular HTML page too. Should not be too difficult. Hightligting can be added for HTML pages too. |
|  | | Re: Ethereal
Sep 22 2006 on content KSniffer |
This application can run on Qt/KDE toolkit whereas ethereal can't ;-)
Seriously, I am bored of dog slow ethereal. |
| | | Re:New Seamonkey
Jan 16 2006 on poll Favourite Web Browser? |
uh, doesn't fully support yet :(.
Try rich-text composing in konqueror, you will realise it!
Konqueror can't still do rich text composing! |
| | | WONDERFUL!
Dec 24 2005 on content Qlouds |
It is one of the best layouts I have ever seen!
You did a mistake of posting ugly screenshots there. Most of the people judged based upon those screenshots, that's why its ratings are poor.
You have done an amazing work to best utilize qt4 architecture! May be its source code would be a learning point for many of developers! |
| |
| | | Re: Some useful
Nov 8 2005 on content KleanSweep |
1) thanks for planning to add it.
2) unless you wanted to be vendor neutral, I dont think it requires separate utility.
looking over the feature
"* orphaned files (files not found in RPM database)."
you are not vendor neutral.
IMHO, deborphan like utility should actually be part of big program like this, because they both have exactly same purpose.
And second thing, adding this support shoul not be really so difficult.
3) this is the most difficult part to implement, but this would be really kickass, if you could do this., it may take much time in designing,planning, getting enough information about how to implement and actual implementation.
But, believe me, the space gained by all other methods would be only 20% than the space gained by this method!
So it worths the hassle. The goal of the project should be to remove every file not accesses within certain reasonable time period, without breaking system package management database. |
| | | Re: Slackware package
Nov 2 2005 on content KleanSweep |
there must be some command of SCons which install the program.
that command may be specified as command line option to checkinstal |
| | | Some useful ideas
Nov 2 2005 on content KleanSweep |
I have got some useful ideas about how to remove unneeded files.
1 .Check access time of files.
many packages on linux is installed by distribution, which the user even doesn't know and dont need. They can be identified by checking the access time of files. and then finding which packages own those files! Then remove those rpm packages.
I have got many MB free space just utilizing this method on /usr/lib with "find"
2. Show rpm packages without dependecny.
There are many rpm packages which are not required by any of the rpm. and many of them user have not installed intentionaly. Distributions install them in the hope that user would use them.
Then user can immediately identify those packages, which are not required by them. and because those rpms are not needed by any other rpm, then can remove them.
3. There are many many files in a rpm, which are absolutely never accessed at all. Only a few file are used by the system and rpm is installed for that tiny file in rpm.
for example, think, how many times any user uses the file in /usr/share/doc ?
There is a approach which can solve this trouble.
Replace all those files with a stub file. Then whenever those file, if ever, accessed, just give SIGSTOP signal to accessor process and then place that file back to there by extracting from the rpm.
this would require daemon running, which watches for file access (similar to FAM). |
| | | Re: Fonts
Aug 5 2005 on content Advanced Search Toolbar for Konqueror |
Screenshots updated.
Actually, I tried to make The text look as good as Picture, otherwise, it would have not looked nice.
Initially I tried simple shadowing.
That didn't look much better, which you saw in screenshot.
Suddenly I remembered the "This month in SVN site"
http://www.hoult.org/~canllaith/articles.html
It has extremely nice shadow effect, and then I tried to found, how?
I found through that page-source that CSS2 has a "text-shadow" property, which defines "blur" attribute. Certainly KHTML is rendering that property.
I found the code from lxr.kde.org and it was a function paintshadow(). Just lifted the code, and it worked nicely after some adjustment!!
I have hard-coded the blur and shadow offsets, as I didn't find it useful to provide it configurable.
Also, the colors of texts are got from the favicon displayed. May be one day I will make text multicolored, taken from favicon!! |
| |
Search people
Current visitors
New users
Birthdays
Most active users
Back
|
|
