| Re: Re: Re: MyISAM to InnoDB?
May 11 2009 on content WebIssues Client |
Thanks :)
For now issues cannot be deleted. It's one of the most important features planned for version 1.0. |
|  | | Re: MyISAM to InnoDB?
May 11 2009 on content WebIssues Client |
Well, both MyISAM and InnoDB have their advantages and disadvantages. WebIssues is not transactional so far, so I think there would be no great benefit from using InnoDB. And from what I read, MyISAM is faster when you more often SELECT than UPDATE. Besides WebIssues doesn't force MyISAM (or any other particular settings except for UTF-8 charset), it just uses the defaults, so you can change the settings at database level. |
| | | Re: help required
Feb 18 2009 on content WebIssues Client |
This seems to be a general problem not related to WebIssues. Try googling for the error message, you should be able to find a solution. |
| | | Re: New ebuild
May 19 2008 on content Fraqtive |
Thanks! Just one note: the 0.4.x versions of Fraqtive require Qt 4.3 or newer and no longer depend on KDE. I forgot to update the "Depends on" field in the description :). |
| | | Re: Nice work
Mar 26 2008 on content Fraqtive |
Thanks for your comment. I will check and fix this bug.
Handling complex templates in VC 2003 is very buggy, so I'm not surprised it doesn't work. Fraqtive compiles fine using VC 2005. Earlier versions are not supported (now that I know that for sure, I will add this information to the INSTALL file). |
| | | Re: Great news !
Nov 27 2007 on content WebIssues Client |
I will gladly assist you with any help. The WebIssues forums seem like a good place to start (http://webissues.mimec.org/forum).
I'm planning to have a little break from developing WebIssues after the final release, but that sounds like a perfect thing to do in the meantime. |
| | | Re: need some help
Jul 4 2007 on content WebIssues Client |
I just installed Qt 4.3.0 (previously I had 4.2.3) and indeed, the original 0.9.0 version crashed after connecting to the server. However the current development version didn't crash, so perhaps you could get the latest sources from the SVN repository and check if that works? |
| | | Re: Re: Re: Pros & c
Jun 1 2007 on content WebIssues Client |
OK, I see. It may be a problem with cmake indeed. Can you email me the generated makefiles? Maybe I'll be able to find a solution / workaround.
The idea of highlighting new issues, comments etc. is very good, I will add it to my roadmap.
I also like the idea of splitting the application. It's actually quite easy as the code is already separated. Of course there are some restrictions in library code like binary compatibility and not using global variables, but this is doable, I will consider it.
Thanks for your comments. I invite you to the WebIssues forums (http://webissues.mimec.org/forum). |
| | | Re: Pros & cons
May 31 2007 on content WebIssues Client |
I've chosen CMake because I come from KDE and that's what they recently switched to. If it works for the project the size of KDE, it must work for me :). I'm sure it would work for you as well, perhaps you just have to set some paths etc. What errors did you get with CMake?
About the config file... setting three or four parameters in a text file is not a big inconvenience. When the config reaches 20 options, I promise to write a wizard :). |
| |
| |
Search people
Current visitors
New users
Birthdays
Most active users
Back
|
|
