| Re: Re: qt base xmms
Dec 3 2004 on Discussion |
amaroK rules. |
|  | | Re: Re: Re: Re: Respect women
Nov 22 2004 on Discussion |
I'm trying to figure out how I'm on a a "crusade for internet holyness". Sure, there's a lot of trash sites out there. I choose not to go to them. My big issue here is not that the content is on the site somewhwere, but when I open the page and there's some pictures of of these girls that I do not have a choice to see. I agree, a lot of people probably like that, and that is their choice. But as others have said, there are children, etc., who also visit this site. Why not create a category called "risque" or whatever for those who wish to view these items. In the same respect, I don't beleive it's right for postings of religious items in the same way. There are other places for people to fully express their freedoms. If needbe, why not make a category for that too. I'm not trying to get this all banned from the site or anything like that. As far as I'm concerned, that's not my choice. |
| | | Re: Re: Respect women
Nov 19 2004 on Discussion |
True, one doesn't have to click on the link, but there's still the tumbnail. Maybe there should be no thumbnails allowed for questionable contant. What if some kids are looking around...they shouldn't be subjected to that. I personally don't want to see it. |
| | | Baghira on PPC
Jun 10 2004 on content Baghira |
Just a quick note that Baghira doesn't render properly when used on PPC (at leastm it doesn't on my Powerbook). The edge of the buttons have somewhat of an outline, and the progress bar is messed. I can post a few screenshots if you'd like.
It does look nice on my x86 machine though. |
| | | Great start...
Nov 16 2003 on content Kio-Apt |
This is great idea and very good start for this. I can see many things that could be added to this, and would love to see further devolpment and addition features (maybe like a Konquer-based Synaptic). Mymain criticsm as it stands is that maybe the search and show coulp be simplified in some way that one doesn't have to remember the 'search?' or such (maybe make it something simpler like 'apt-search:/searchstring and apt-show:/packagename' Other than that, very excellent. That ratins should be higher. |
| |
Search people
Current visitors
New users
Birthdays
Most active users
Back
|
|
