| ..
Oct 24 2002 on news alive and angry |
I never said anything about rh being the one and only, and that marcello is the 2.4 kernel maintainer does'nt mean he is the best kernel maintainer etc., and I also said only "probably", cox has been in this for a looong time, and I am pretty sure that he has alot more experience, just because linus himself is'nt the 2.4 kernel maintainer anymore, does'nt mean that marcello might be better, does it? and as I said; the reason that neither alan cox nor linus torvald maintains 2.4 is because they're focusing on 2.5
And I did'nt say that the kernels where final, I only pointed out that they've never been named "beta"
"2.6 vs. 3.0 anyone? Same thing, two different names." same thing, two different names? ehhr.. no? Linus still has'nt changed his name about the version name, and if it'll be 2.6 as he wants it to be named, 3.0 will be a totally different version.
and about mentioning designers in this is totally irrelevant, if you want to list up all people who has contributed stuff who works for linux companies like rh, suse etc. you will have to list up *alot* of people, and actually, rh would be one of them who has contributed the most.
Oh, btw. I don't use RH myself, so don't get the impression of me being a RH-fanatic |
|  | | eh?
Oct 23 2002 on news alive and angry |
what has that to do with it?
marcello might be the 2.4 kernel maintainer now, since linus, alan cox etc. are now focusing on 2.5/2.6, and Cox has been hacking kernel since before even Marcello could spell it;)
and, WTF? Why are you mentioning Everaldo? are you stupid?
Anyways, from your reply I've already figured out that you must be just plain stupid, as my point was that rh had a very good kernel maintainer and claiming that rh is releasing "beta" kernels is just stupid(I don't think any kernel even has had a beta version, just test, pre, etc.)
To sum it all up and at the same time keeping up with the trolling and flaming, you're and incompetent idiot
|
| | | RE: I don't understa
Oct 21 2002 on news alive and angry |
you saved us during ww2? bah, your lousy pathetic country did'nt move a finger to help until they got caught by a surprise by the japs, and you did even launch an atomic bomb, now that's worse than what hitler managed to do, well, anyways, most of the linux developers stand disagrees with mosfet, so ... I'll allow myself to go down to your level and make it simple and childish; STFU INCOMPETENT GIMP!
|
| | | beta?
Oct 21 2002 on news alive and angry |
you have no idea what you're talking about whatsoever, beta kernels?!?! you know, Alan Cox IS rh's kernel maintainer, so there is probably no other distro that has such a good kernel maintainer!:p
beta c++ libs? no way josé! rh release "gcc-2.96" because of gcc-2.95.3's lousy c++ support and it did'nt follow standards very well neither.
And when it comes to LFS and other similar distro's, NOONE serious uses these distro's, they lack the commercial support, package system, quality checking etcetc.
as for mosfet, I like liquid, but I think he's behaviour is childish and... uhm... no reason to dwell on that one and talking shit about others, but the behaviour is just plain stupid. |
| | | Much better before:(
Sep 25 2002 on content Crystal GT |
Dude, the icons were much better before, and what is this green colors all about?
that's really xp style:\
The blue colors were much better, the old buttons too.
At least, don't use the green colors!
|
| |
Search people
Current visitors
New users
Birthdays
Most active users
Back
|
|
