| No the protesters
Dec 3 2003 on content only picture.don't think more!terminator |
Where is all the "dont post religius wallpapers"-people ??? So I guess its okay to use Linux for communist propagande, but not anything else.
Clap along with me: Double-standards.
_________________________
Rød front, min bare røv! |
|  | | Re: Re: Re: Re: Tux
Oct 17 2003 on Discussion |
My political views are not the issue here. I mean cant you see the double moral here ?? Religous wallpapers are not allowed, but socialst wallpapers are actually okay ?? Who decides what view is right ?? Either we bann all or none. Anything else would be unfair censorship. I dont use Linux because it fits some illusion about "anti-corporate OS", I mean if you hate companies for making money like MS does, then what about redhat, suse or machintosh ?? They're in it for the money also.
Its like dictatorship, no opposition is allowed, because anything not "insert flavor of dictatorship here" is unjust. Is it such a narrow minded single-sided view of oppinions that exist here ?? |
| | | Re: Tux a socialist
Oct 15 2003 on Discussion |
okay..makes you wonder what a liberal, free market believer and pro-american european like myself is doing here then.
Either you protest all political propaganda use of linux, or none at all. |
| | | Re: Got this? Got th
Oct 14 2003 on Discussion |
How about those "Tux would be a socialist" wallpapers ?? No one seems to protest them , yet they make my blod boil, just as much as christ papers make yours. |
| | | Re: Not my fault
Oct 12 2003 on content My humble desktop |
Problem solved....the error was due to nothing...now it works, now it doesnt. |
| | | Not my fault
Oct 12 2003 on content My humble desktop |
Im just not allowed to upload the picture...nasty feature. |
| | | Re: abuse
Oct 11 2003 on content Tux Red |
i agree, its strange that we dont see those "dont post jesus-wallpapers here" complaining over this one.... |
| | | Re: Re: Huh?!
Oct 11 2003 on content Tux Red |
Its funny how its always claimed that USSR wasnt socialism. But think about all the places socialism has been implementet (or attemted to be, as you claim), it has allways ended up in dictaturship, oppression and genicide. So this might not be socialism according to theory, but its socialism according to realism. The ideoligy has failed whereever it reared its ugly face. Have you ever considered that maybe the reason why socialism always fails is that it fails to understand that humans are gready ?? But still, its understandable that many user from this site is attracted to socialism. As i understand most users here are german, and a new wave of anti-americanism is washing over that country so its understandable that young people who cant remember the cold war think that socialism is the answer...usually it fades when they grow up. |
| |
Search people
Current visitors
New users
Birthdays
Most active users
Back
|
|
