| Re: kio for other's
Feb 17 2007 on content kio-rpm/deb |
I'm really not sure how usefull this would be for a package database. However it could prove usefull if it were just a kioslave to be able to browse within an rpm or deb file. Like you can with a tar file. I actually came accross this while looking for a kioslave for cpio because I'm trying to open an rpm while rpm is compiling. |
|  | | Re: Re: Why a bad idea?
Jul 30 2006 on content amaroK Video Capable [MockUp] |
The issue of "being bloated" has been dabated over and over. What exactly is your definition of being bloated? And how exactly would amarok become bloated? |
| | | Re: Re: Why a bad idea?
Jul 30 2006 on content amaroK Video Capable [MockUp] |
You don't like that kaffeine plays audio? If it didn't then the movies would be pretty dull without being able to hear what's going on in the movie. This isn't what you had in mind of course but I couldn't resist my little joke. |
| | | Why a bad idea?
Jul 29 2006 on content amaroK Video Capable [MockUp] |
How is an app that does everything useless? If it's done well wouldn't it make it more usefull? How would it become worhless? If amorok did start to be able to play video would you stop using it for music just because it was able to play video as well? Kaffeine is able to play both. why not amarok? I don't know why people are so quick to shoot down an idea like this.
I've noticed that allot of people complain when an app does more than one thing, yet they also complain that they have too many apps installled. Amarok already does allot, it plays just about any audio file be it local or remote. It even does streaming audio. Why would it be that bad to add video capabilities? I for one think it would be a good idea. AmaroK already uses the xine engine, which is a video engine is it not? I don't use amarok to play audio cd's or streams. does this mean that amarok should have not put in the ability to do this? No, because someone esle might find it usefull. If amarok started playing video I wouldn't need another multimedia player. Not even kaffeine.
Amarok wouldn't need to add video to a database. It could just open them the way any other program would. |
| | | Re: Re: Ebuild in bugzil
Apr 6 2006 on content Linspire Clear for Gentoo |
I'd use the one in bugzilla. It's the up to date version from linspire's website. |
| |
Search people
Current visitors
New users
Birthdays
Most active users
Back
|
|
